JEHOVAH IS NOT GOD.

Have you ever been approached by a group called JWs or Jehovah Witnesses? They are almost everywhere and they are very zealous people who thinks GOD's true name is JEHOVAH. But the truth is way too far behind and the name Jehovah is not God's name but rather a transliteration or pronounciation. JEHOVAH is not GOD's name.

Did you know that "the name Jehovah was invented first time in the Middle Ages primal!

For all the world the information is testable, where the name Jehovah comes from, available on the Internet. On Wikipedia under the search word Jehovah, we find the following information:

The name Jehovah already occurs repeatedly in the 13th Century in the Latin form of Jehovah. The Spanish monk Raymond Mantini, translated about 1270 different parts of the Bible from the Hebrew. In his manuscripts is on the right side the Hebrew text and on the left the Latin with Iehovah.

Cardinal Nikolaus of Kues used the Tetragrammaton vocalized as Jehovah in several of his works, 1428, in his Sermon In Principio Erat Verbum.

Petrus Galatinus published in the year 1518 his work "De Arcnis catholicae veritatis".

As William Tyndale, translated the Pentateuch 1530, he transferred the Tetragrammaton also by using the word Jehovah." 0

"Question: "What is YHWH? What is the tetragrammaton?"

Answer: The ancient Hebrew language that the Old Testament was written in did not have vowels in its alphabet. In written form, ancient Hebrew was a consonant-only language. In the original Hebrew, God’s name transliterates to YHWH (sometimes written in the older style as YHVH). This is known as the tetragrammaton (meaning “four letters”). Because of the lack of vowels, Bible scholars debate how the tetragrammaton YHWH was pronounced.

The tetragrammaton consists of four Hebrew letters: yodh, he, waw, and then he repeated. Some versions of the Bible translate the tetragrammaton as “Yahweh” or “Jehovah”; most translate it as “LORD” (all capital letters).

Contrary to what some Christians believe (and at least one cult), Jehovah is not the Divine Name revealed to Israel. The name Jehovah is a product of mixing different words and different alphabets of different languages. Due to a fear of accidentally taking God’s name in vain (Leviticus 24:16), the Jews basically quit saying it out loud altogether. Instead, when reading Scripture aloud, the Jews substituted the tetragrammaton YHWH with the word Adonai (“Lord”). Even in the Septuagint (the Greek translation of the Old Testament), the translators substituted Kurios (“Lord”) for the Divine Name. Eventually, the vowels from Adonai (“Lord”) or Elohim (“God”) found their way in between the consonants of YHWH, thus forming YaHWeH. But this interpolation of vowels does not mean that was how God’s name was originally pronounced. In fact, we aren’t entirely sure if YHWH should have two syllables or three.

Any number of vowel sounds can be inserted within YHWH, and Jewish scholars are as uncertain of the real pronunciation as Christian scholars are. Jehovah is actually a much later (probably 16th-century) variant. The word Jehovah comes from a three-syllable version of YHWH, YeHoWeH. The Y was replaced with a J (although Hebrew does not even have a J sound) and the W with a V, plus the extra vowel in the middle, resulting in JeHoVaH. These vowels are the abbreviated forms of the imperfect tense, the participial form, and the perfect tense of the Hebrew being verb (English is)—thus the meaning of Jehovah could be understood as “He who will be, is, and has been.”

So, what is God’s Name, and what does it mean? The most likely choice for how the tetragrammaton was pronounced is “YAH-way,” “YAH-weh,” or something similar. The name Yahweh refers to God’s self-existence. Yahweh is linked to how God described Himself in Exodus 3:14, “God said to Moses, ‘I AM WHO I AM. This is what you are to say to the Israelites: “I AM has sent me to you.”’” God’s name is a reflection of His being. God is the only self-existent or self-sufficient Being. Only God has life in and of Himself. That is the essential meaning of the tetragrammaton, YHWH." 1

Where did the name “Jehovah” come from?

"“Jehovah” is a mispronunciation of the Hebrew name of God, resulting from a confusion over what vowels were to be included when saying the name.

The Hebrew name of God is יהוה (YHWH). This was revealed to Moses by God in Exodus 6:2-3Open in Logos Bible Software (if available). In Hebrew, there are usually no vowels inserted and it is up to the reader to insert the vowels at the time of reading. Most scholars think the vowels in the name of God are A and E making Yahweh.

Several centuries before Jesus, Jews stopped pronouncing the name of God as it was too sacred, and they started to substitute the word Adonay (Lord) instead whenever they came across the word Yahweh. Then later editions of the Hebrew scriptures added vowel pointings to guide readers. For YHWH, the vowels for Adonai were added to remind readers to read “Adonai” and not “Yahweh”. This actually made a non-word “Yehowah”.

The Hebrew letter “W” (waw) is now pronounced more like a “V” in modern Hebrew, and so is often transliterated as a V instead of a W. The Hebrew letter “Y” (yod) is often historically transliterated as a “J” due to its pronunciation in late Latin. Consequently, we get the name “Jehovah” although that was never the original word and probably does not sound anything like the Hebrew name of God."2

"Question: "Is Jehovah the true name of God?"

Answer: In the Hebrew Scriptures, the name of God is recorded as YHWH. So, where did the name “Jehovah” come from? Ancient Hebrew did not use vowels in its written form. The vowels were pronounced in spoken Hebrew but were not recorded in written Hebrew. The appropriate vowel sounds of words were passed down orally. As a result, when ancient Hebrew is studied, scholars and linguists often do not know with absolute confidence how certain Hebrew words were pronounced.

This particularly becomes an issue when studying the Hebrew name of God, written in the Hebrew Scriptures as YHWH, also known as the tetragrammaton. Despite much study and debate, it is still not universally agreed upon how the Hebrew name for God YHWH was pronounced. Some prefer “Yahweh” (YAH-way); others prefer “Yehowah” or “Yahuweh”; still others argue for “Jehovah.”

As you can see, virtually everything is up for debate. Should YHWH be pronounced with three syllables or two? Should the vowels be borrowed from Elohim or Adonai? Should the W be pronounced with more of a W sound or more of a V sound? It is not the purpose of this article to settle the debate. Rather, it is the purpose of this article to discuss the use of “Jehovah.”

The vast majority of Jewish and Christian biblical scholars and linguists do not believe “Jehovah” to be the proper pronunciation of YHWH. There was no true J sound in ancient Hebrew. Even the Hebrew letter vav, which is transliterated as the W in YHWH is said to have originally had a pronunciation closer to W than the V of Jehovah. Jehovah is essentially a Germanic pronunciation of the Latinized transliteration of the Hebrew YHWH. It is the letters of the tetragrammaton, Latinized into JHVH, with vowels inserted. “Yahweh” or “Yehowah” is far more likely to be the correct pronunciation.

The form Jehovah, though, is very commonly used. It is used in the King James Version of the Bible (Genesis 22:14; Exodus 6:3; 17:15; Judges 6:24; Psalm 83:18; Isaiah 12:2; 26:4). It is also used, and strenuously promoted by, the Jehovah’s Witnesses. The Jehovah’s Witnesses emphasize the use of Jehovah to the extent that any other name or title for God is viewed as borderline idolatry or outright heresy.

With all of that said, it is not crucial to the Christian faith for the proper pronunciation of YHWH to be known. Both the Old and New Testaments, inspired by God, use generic terms for “God” and “Lord,” including El, Elohim, and Adonai (Hebrew); and Theos and Kurios (Greek). If the authors of Scripture, under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, were allowed to use these terms, it is not wrong for us to refer to Him as “God” or “Lord,” either.

In conclusion, it is highly unlikely that “Jehovah” is the correct pronunciation of YHWH. Further, it is far more important to know God through faith in Jesus Christ, than it is to know the correct pronunciation of His name in Hebrew."3


Footnotes:
0 - extracted from http://www.antichrist-watchtower.org/jehovah-primal-invented-in-medieval.xhtml
1 - https://www.gotquestions.org/YHWH-tetragrammaton.html
2-http://bibleq.net/answer/87/
3- https://www.gotquestions.org/Jehovah.html

SATANISM IN ISLAM!

Is the Quran the word of God? For years scholars mainly from the west have questioned the authenticity of the nobility of the so-called "the recitation" or the revelation by God to Muhammad through the angel Jibril and literally found to be in darkness. The BOOK of ISLAM is sad to say a false revelation and historically no concrete foundation and can be concluded as a hoax. 

The Satanic Verses in Qur'an

"Now tell me about Al-Lat, Al-Uzza, and Manat,
The third one, another goddess.
What! For you the males and for him the females!
That indeed is an unfair division." - Sura an-Najm (Star) 53:19-22

The "satanic verses" are, in transliteration from Arabic, tilk al-gharaniq al-'ula wa inna shafa'ata-hunna la-turtaja, and translate into English as "these are exalted females whose intercession is to be desired" (Satanic Verses p. 340). (Note on the translation of these verses.) The verses comprising this sentence are said to have been added to the 53rd sura of the Qur'an entitled Surat-annajm, The Star (53:19ff)in order to acknowledge the validity of the goddesses Lat, Manat, and 'Uzza. The tradition goes on to say that the verses were later withdrawn and denounced as "satanic." (The "Satanic Verses" Note by Joel Kuortti )

Islam is not a religion of peace but a religion based on violence. The Quran cannot be the word of GOD... it is from the deceiver.. a book inspired by the DEVIL itself!

THE SUPPRESSED & HIDDEN HISTORY OF ISLAM.

Banned in some countries outside of the UK. A seasoned journalist, historical author attempts to find archaeological & literary evidence for the alleged Arabian Prophet of Islam outside of the Qur'an/Hadiths having access to the latest findings, going to the lands in question to look for key historical evidence.

R. Spencer's book "Did Muhammad Exist?" review;

"Essentially, Spencer maintains that the Arabian empire came first, the theology came later.

He concludes: "A careful investigation makes at least one thing clear: The details of Muhammad's life that have been handed down as canonical—that he unified Arabia by the force of arms, concluded alliances, married wives, legislated for his community, and did so much else—are a creation of political ferment dating from long after the time he is supposed to have lived. Similarly, the records strongly indicate that the Qur'an did not exist until long after it was supposed to have been delivered to the prophet of Islam."

"Did Muhammad exist? As a prophet of the Arabs who taught a vaguely defined monotheism, he may have existed. But beyond that, his life story is lost in the mists of legend, like those of Robin Hood and Macbeth. As the prophet of Islam, who received (or even claimed to receive) the perfect copy of the perfect eternal book from the supreme God, Muhammad almost certainly did not exist. There are too many gaps, too many silences, too many aspects of the historical record that simply do not accord, and cannot be made to accord, with the traditional account of the Arabian prophet teaching his Qur'an, energizing his followers to such an extent that they went out and conquered a good part of the world." (pp.214-215)

How will Muslims respond to this book? Some may seek to curse the author. They may respond in outrage. But that will not disprove the facts presented here. Islam is supposed to be a religion based in history. It is supposed to be a religion of reason. But if history will not support the claims of Islam, is it time for Muslims to rethink the legitimacy of Islam? Blind commitment to the teachings of the local imam will not be enough in this age of instant information and verification of facts" http://www.answering-islam.org/author...

Tom Holland's response to criticism of his documentary;

http://tinyurl.com/pcyrjuo

Note by A2T;

In Syro-Aramaic, a language that preceded Arabic, the word "Muhammad" isn't a name but a *title* defined as "The Anointed One/Chosen One". This title was the Syro-Aramaic reference to "The Christ" of the Bible in the areas of Syria and vicinity which historical evidence indisputably proves, then it would have of an Arab Prophet whom is unable to be found outside of the Qu'ran/Hadiths unless they're the few spurious sources that can't be corroborated/verified by other contemporaneous sources sufficiently since being pseudopigraphica's, which coincidentally comes from Catholic sources ultimately, thereby being suspect as to error in translation understanding by deliberate design more so then due to it being likely to general illiteracy of such populations of these times in such areas, which as well would have assisted greatly in spreading the wrong translation definition.

In the circa 1300-1400 year old story of an "Arab Prophet" built on actual factual history or is it a corrupted version of various astro-polytheistic/pantheistic/animistic religions of western Mesopotamia merged with certain Biblical stories being understood in a philosophical/gnostic/heathen way with only touches of Abrahamic understanding when seen though the lens of evidential history? For the student whom diligently/rigorously seeks and studies factual ancient/classical history, digs even deeper, they will find that Islam's monotheistic position begins when Rome has already been in the same areas since circa mid 4th century seeking converts to Roman Catholicism. Could modern Islam be a Romanized cult that could be called "Arabian Catholicism"? intermixed accordingly with various anti-biblical heathen religions, which Catholicism basically is in different flavours depending on where it is in the world which in the case of Islam, and gave Islam it's start around 720AD (officially by evidence, not tradition) with an eerie clue being how closely the dress of a Islamic women (Hijab) and a Catholic Nun's covering is for example? Or is Islam a more nefarious strategy by Rome's agents (Egyptian - Templar - Jesuit Jews (Edomite/sons of Esau) through murder and suppression of true history among other things to use as a fierce attack dog for decimating the world population, as is already occurring in order to usher in a One World Order?

Some who appear in the above documentary, either know an "Arabian Prophet" is myth into reality and are being dishonest, or they are unaware of such evidence. Did an alleged "Arabian Prophet" with the alleged 'name' of "Muhammad" actually exist, or is this really a Roman deception?

Exposing False Prophets and Teachers.

A needful documentary exposing the false religious leaders of the TV world; last day filthy lucre; false ideas of Godhood; false ideas of prosperity; false healing and more.

They promise health, wealth, and prosperity in exchange for your donations; but in reality, televangelists become filthy rich, while the people who support them remain poor, sick, and misfortunate! God is against those TV preachers!

Seventh-day Adventism - The Spirit behind The Church

I hope you have understood the truth about Seventh Day Adventism specifically regarding their core doctrine about the SABBATH. (You can read and watch my recent posts about their errors and cultic belief about the Sabbath HERE (Should Christians Keep The Sabbath? - A Refutation of Seventh Day Adventism and the Hebrew Roots Movement ) and HERE ( Is Sabbath Keeping Essential to Be a Real Christian? ).

The next video I would like you to watch is the Youtube Video entitled "Seventh-day Adventism - The Spirit behind The Church". Examine the findings prayfully and you decide if the gospel they are teaching is truly the Gospel of Christ. God bless.. happy viewing!






This hard-hitting, eye-opening documentary explores the teachings of the Seventh-day Adventist Church, its origins, and the changes which have occurred throughout the years. It examines the claims of the religion's founder, the late prophetess Ellen G.White, and compares her unique beliefs with Biblical truth.

You will meet a number of former high-ranking Seventh-day Adventist Church leaders, many of them 4th generation members, and discover what happened when they embarked on a journey to uncover the truth about their organization. You will be shocked and amazed at what they found.

"For those who may agree or for those who strongly disagree, the viewers of this documentary will find it a most fascinating exploration into the cultic aspects of the teachings of Ellen G. White. Recommended for Christians who seek genuine answers based on the best scholarship and firm adherence to the truth of God's Word." - Dr. James Kennedy. Ph.D., Senior Minister. Coral Ridge Presbyterian Church. Ft. Lauderdale, Florida

THE PSEUDO-CHRIST OF ROMANISM, ARMINIANISM, THE CULTS AND FALSE RELIGIONS.

The Christ of Arminianism (Freewillism) by Rev. Steven Houck

"Take heed that no man deceive you. For many shall come in my name, saying I am Christ; and shall deceive many." (Matt. 24:4-5).

The Bible warns us that in the last days in which we live there will be many false Christs-those who claim to be Christ but who are imposters. Jesus said, "Take heed that no man deceive you. For many shall come in my name, saying I am Christ; and shall deceive many." (Matt. 24:4-5). We who profess to be Christians must take heed. We must be very careful that we are not deceived. Our calling is to trust, love, and follow the true Christ and Him only. We may have nothing to do with the false Christs who are so numerous in our day.

We know about the Christ of the cults and other religions. He is a good man, a prophet, the first creation of God, a great spirit, a divine idea, or even a god himself. But he is not true and eternal God. He receives his existence from another who is greater than he. He is not the Christ of the Bible. We are not deceived by this Christ. He is a false Christ.

We know about the Christ of Roman Catholicism. They profess that He is true God. He suffered and died for the forgiveness of sin. He arose again, ascended into heaven, and is coming again. But he is not a complete Savior. The Christ of the Roman Catholics can not save sinners without their own good works and the intercession of priests. He is not the Christ of the Bible. We are not deceived by this Christ. He is a false Christ.

There is, however, another false Christ who is much more dangerous than the Christ of the cults and the Christ of Roman Catholicism. He has deceived people for many years and he continues to deceive millions. This Christ is so dangerous that, if it were not impossible, he would deceive the very elect (Matt. 24:24). He is the Christ of Arminianism.

This false Christ is extremely dangerous because in many ways he appears to be the True Christ. They say that he is true God, equal with the Father and the Holy Spirit. They say that he died on the cross to save sinners. They even say that he saves by his grace alone, without the work of man. This Christ will have nothing to do with the Christ of the cults and the Christ of Roman Catholicism.

But watch out! Be warned! The Christ of Arminianism is not the Christ of the Bible. Do not be fooled!
The Christ of Arminianism - loves every individual person in the world and sincerely desires their salvation.

The Christ of the Bible - earnestly loves and desires the salvation of only those whom God has unconditionally chosen to salvation. (Ps. 5:5, Ps. 7:11, Ps. 11:5, Matt. 11:27, John 17:9-10, Acts 2:47, Acts 13:48, Rom. 9:10-13, Rom. 9:21-24, Eph. 1:3-4)

The Christ of Arminianism - offers salvation to every sinner and does all in his power to bring them to salvation. His offer and work are often frustrated, for many refuse to come.

The Christ of the Bible - effectually calls to Himself only the elect and sovereignly brings them to salvation. Not one of them will be lost. (Isa. 55:11, John 5:21, John 6:37-40, John 10:25-30, John 17:2, Phil. 2:13)

The Christ of Arminianism - can not regenerate and save a sinner who does not first choose Christ with his own "free will." All men have a "free will" by which they can either accept or reject Christ. That "free will" may not be violated by Christ.

The Christ of the Bible - sovereignly regenerates the elect sinner apart from his choice, for without regeneration the spiritually dead sinner can not choose Christ. Faith is not man's contribution to salvation but the gift of Christ which He sovereignly imparts in regeneration. (John 3:3, John 6:44 & 65, John 15:16, Acts 11:18, Rom. 9:16, Eph. 2:1,Eph. 2:8-10, Phil. 1:29, Hebr. 12:2)

The Christ of Arminianism - died on the cross for every individual person and thereby made it possible for every person to be saved. His death, apart from the choice of man, was not able to actually save anyone for many for whom he died are lost.

The Christ of the Bible - died for only God's elect people and thereby actually obtained salvation for all those for whom He died. His death was a substitutionary satisfaction which actually took away the guilt of His chosen people. (Luke 19:10, John 10:14-15 & 26, Acts 20:28, Rom. 5:10, Eph. 5:25, Hebr. 9:12, I Peter 3:18)

The Christ of Arminianism - loses many whom he has "saved" because they do not continue in faith. Even if he does give them "eternal security," as some say, that security is not based upon his will or work but the choice which the sinner made when he accepted Christ.

The Christ of the Bible - preserves His chosen people so that they can not lose their salvation but persevere in the faith to the very end. He preserves them by the sovereign electing will of God, the power of His death, and the mighty working of His Spirit. (John 5:24, John 10:26-29, Rom. 8:29-30, Rom. 8:35-39, I Peter 1:2-5, Jude 24-25)
As you can see, although the Christ of Arminianism and the Christ of the Bible may at first seem to be the same, they are very different. One is a false Christ. The other is the true Christ. One is weak and helpless. He bows before the sovereign "free will" of man. The other is the reigning Lord Who wills what He pleases and sovereignly accomplishes all that He wills.

If you believe and serve the Christ of Arminianism, you must recognize the fact that you do not serve the Christ of the Bible. You have been deceived! Study the Scriptures and learn of the True Christ. Pray for grace to repent and trust Christ as your sovereign Savior. 

SOURCE: REFORMEDSPOKANE.ORG

Iglesia ni Manalo - A Masonic New World Order Cult in South East Asia.

Romanism arrived in the so-called Philippines of Roman Catholic Conquest during the second conquest after the Portuguese "conquestador" Ferdinand Magellan was killed by Datu Lapu-Lapu in the battle of Mactan. It was the Spanish "conquestador" Miguel Lopez de Legaspi and his company of six Augustinian Roman Catholic Priests (FRIARS) who initiated the convertions of the locals into Romanism. It was said to be that  Andrés de Urdaneta lead the decepetions using false Gospel in converting the natives in Cebu, Samar and Bohol islands which gave way to friendship of the the returning foreign invaders. Deceptions was used by friars that gave way to a blood compact as the foreigners progressively deceived and influenced the locals to side with them and invade neigbouring balangays and towns. This was the beginning of the reign of Rome's power through the Spanish Colonizers to subdue the Malayan islands and the rest of the world to pursue their Satanic plan of a One World Government and religion, and of course the Pope as its spiritual head.

For 400 years approximately the Malayan Islands who is now known as the Philippines became a Masonic Republic after an orchestrated revolution by Illuminati Freemasons with a black flag "Skull n Bones" and Freemasonry symbolisms. The First President of the Philippines was Gen. Emilio Aguinaldo, a known Luciferian Freemason who was helped by the United States of America to come into power after swearing an allegiance to United States of America in return for the peace declaration he made after being captured by the Americans. This was the beginning of Emilio Aguinaldo's Masonic Government with the helped of Pres. William McKinley who was later assassinated by the Jesuit Illuminati I believe because of gold control in the Spanish and New World-USA teritorries.

In the Philippines, by the year 1914 Iglesia Ni Cristo was registered then proclaimed itself to be the one true church and claims that it is the restoration of the original church founded by Jesus and that all other Christian churches, including the Roman Catholic Church, are apostates. This is the beginnings of the 20th Century Masonic Philippines as part of the New World Order with the support of Masonic American Government who then promoting freedom of religion in the U.S.A. as part of their agenda for a New World Order. Pres. William McKinley, the twenty-fifth President of USA was a freemason. He was initiated May 1, 1865 in Hiram Lodge No. 21, Winchester, Virginia. A Luciferian who helped the Philippines become a stronghold of the New World Order in the Asia-Pacific region. Iglesia ni Manalo with its Masonic symbolism is obviously a Cult that is part of the New World Order Masonic Jesuit illuminati cults. The below article will give us more details about Iglesia ni Manalo as a cult. 

For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist. - 2 Jn.1:7 KJV

WARNING: This post contains material that is for mature adults only.

We recently returned from a West Coast trip and while travelling I spotted a logo on what I thought was a Mormon temple. I wanted to get a better look at it because it was an obvious masonic compass and square. Upon examination I found the church to be called "Iglesia Ni Cristo." I thought that it was Spanish, but upon looking into it I learned that Iglesia Ni Cristo was started in the Philippines and has since spread around the world and has a current membership on a par with the Mormons. The name Iglesia Ni Christo means Church of Christ. 

This post shall begin with some of the core teachings of Iglesia Ni Cristo and then we will take up a detailed analysis of the Iglesia Ni Cristo logo.

The Trinity 

Christ and the Apostles are united in teaching how many and who is the real God. Similar to other true Christians, according to Apostle Paul, there is only one God, the Father—not the Son and more so not the Holy Spirit. The Apostles also did not teach that there is one God who has three personas who are also Gods. ... It [Trinity] is not found in the Holy Scriptures or the Bible, and if [Catholic] priests ever use the Bible to prove this teaching of theirs, all are based only on suppositions and presumptions. source: Iglesia Ni Cristo  translated from Pasugo (November 1968)

"...there is only one God, the Father—not the Son and more so not the Holy Spirit....It [Trinity] is not found in the Holy Scriptures or the Bible..."  -anyone who owns a Bible and can read will be able to easily disprove these false statements of Iglesia Ni Cristo. You are commanded to search the scripture. You are also commanded to study to show thyself approved that you need not be ashamed. You are also commanded to test the spirits of those who would be your teachers. The membership of Iglesia Ni Cristo fail miserably on all accounts.

This is what the Scriptures say if they would bother to look:

God the Father gave all things to his coequal, Jesus Christ: 

John 5:22  For the Father judgeth no man, but hath committed all judgment unto the Son:

Those who honor not the Son have NO HONOR toward the Father either: 

John 5:23  That all men should honour the Son, even as they honour the Father. He that honoureth not the Son honoureth not the Father which hath sent him.

Jesus Christ was co-creator of all things: 

John 1:1 ¶ In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2  The same was in the beginning with God. 3  All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.

The co-creator of all things, JESUS CHRIST,  dwelt with man in the flesh: 

John 1: 14  And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.

Jesus Christ is distinct from his Father, yet they are one. This looks like a contradiction to those who are in the flesh, which is why they stumble over it: 

John 10:30  I and my Father are one.

Jesus, the Spirit of God and God the Father are three distinct persons:

Matthew 3:16  And Jesus, when he was baptized, went up straightway out of the water: and, lo, the heavens were opened unto him, and he saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove, and lighting upon him: 17  And lo a voice from heaven, saying, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.

There are THREE members of the Godhead: 

1 Timothy 3:16  And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory.

What Timothy is talking about in the verse above is exactly what we speak of now.  "without controversy great is the mystery of godliness" - In other words, everyone agreed that there was a great mystery in the nature of God: how that he was manifest in the flesh and how that he was evinced in his spirit. The Spirit and the Son of God ARE GOD. 

The Apostles recognized the triune nature of God:

Matthew 28:19  Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:

According to Iglesia Ni Cristo, "It [Trinity] is not found in the Holy Scriptures or the Bible..." Then what is this:

1 John 5:7  For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.

 Iglesia Ni Cristo teaches the Mormon doctrine of Christ being a created being: 

The church believes that Jesus Christ is the Son of God and the mediator between God the Father and humanity, and was created by God the Father. source: Iglesia Ni Cristo

This statement of Iglesia Ni Cristo (and the Mormons) reveals that they truly do teach falsely. When Jesus Christ came into the world  to live and eventually die for the world he was "made" for that purpose:

Hebrews 2;9  But we see Jesus, who was made a little lower than the angels for the suffering of death, crowned with glory and honour; that he by the grace of God should taste death for every man.

But these people stumble horribly over the truth. Jesus' life and existence did not begin at his conception. Jesus was in the beginning and has always been: 

John 1:1 ¶ In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2  The same was in the beginning with God. 3  All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.

And:

John 1: 14  And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.

And:  

Ephesians 3:9  And to make all men see what is the fellowship of the mystery, which from the beginning of the world hath been hid in God, who created all things by Jesus Christ.

ALL things were made by THE WORD and the WORD is the SON and "without him was not any thing made that was made." So to say that he (Jesus) who made all things was made when John 1:3 says that nothing that was made was made without him MAKES Iglesia Ni Cristo (and the Mormons) false teachers. Jesus Christ was a party to his own incarnation into this world. 1 John 5:7 states that the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost are one. All three are God and God has no beginning and no end. As Timothy said, it is a mystery. This means that God reveals it to his own and conceals it from the tares who stumble.  

The Church

They believe that the Iglesia Ni Cristo is the fulfilment of the passage above while "east" refers to the Philippines where the Church of Christ would be founded. source:Iglesia Ni Cristo

This false teaching of Iglesia Ni Cristo is based upon Isaiah 43:5:

Fear not: for I am with thee: I will bring thy seed from the east, and gather thee from the west...

But who is God speaking to in this verse? Is it the Philippines? Is it China? Is it Hawaii? Fiji perhaps? Let's just make it whatever we need to make it in order to support our cult. No, God is speaking to Jacob, which is Israel. Verse 1 of Isaiah chapter 43:

But now thus saith the LORD that created thee, O Jacob, and he that formed thee, O Israel, Fear not: for I have redeemed thee, I have called thee by thy name; thou art mine.

As C.H. Spurgeon once said, "a text without a context is a pretext" and Iglesia Ni Cristo seems to be in no short supply of those.

The INC teaches that its members constitute the "elect of God" and there is no salvation outside the Iglesia ni Cristo. Faith alone is insufficient for salvation. source:Iglesia Ni Cristo

Only a poor student of the Bible cannot see past this whopper. Did the thief on the cross attend Iglesia Ni Cristo? Was no one saved in the intervening ages? They actually teach that you must attend Iglesia Ni Cristo to be saved. And it should also be noted that to build such an important doctrine upon a single verse of utterly vague application to the point lays bare the deception.

I do not believe that it would be productive to debate with people that teach such things, as it is apparent to me that such organizations are set up for the sole purpose of financial gain and to spread false teaching to prepare the world for Antichrist. They have everything to lose by backing down and their false doctrine has been carefully formulated to ensnare the ignorant, so to change it would mean to risk losing control of the golden geese. Therefore it does not matter how elegant and compelling your arguments might be, such organizations will fight to protect their gold and their hidden agenda.

The Symbol of Iglesia Ni Cristo

The Iglesia Ni Cristo logo is the most heavily occult device that I have observed so far. It is so occult that it isn't. You would think that they jumped the shark, but actually it stands as a testament to "STRONG DELUSION," as millions of people worldwide faithfully believe that Iglesia Ni Cristo is Christian in spite of the fact that Iglesia Ni Cristo boldly proclaims that it is Antichrist by placing this monstrosity on all of its churches.  

Many bloggers and others have pointed out the masonic compass and square that are present in the center of the logo:







However, you will notice that within the Iglesia Ni Cristo logo there is a scale attached to the top of the compass and between the arms of the compass there is a lamb resting atop a book of what looks like several scrolls. These objects provide a definitive and unquestionable connection between this logo and the Scottish Rite 17th Degree "Knight of the East and West":

[caption id="attachment_2160" align="aligncenter" width="702"] 17th Degree "Knight of the East and West"[/caption]

17th Degree – “Knight of the East and West”“The jewel is a heptagonal (seven-sided) medal, half gold and half silver or mother of pearl. These two colors are emblems of the sun and moon, themselves symbols of the Egyptian deities Osiris and Isis, who represent the generative and productive powers of nature, illustrated in Masonic Symbolism by the columns Jachin and Boaz as the active and passive forces manifested in nature (Morals and Dogma, p. 202). On one side are engraved, at the angles, the same letters as are on the capitals of the columns in the ceremony and possessing the same meaning, that of the last seven of the Sephiroth of the Kabalah. A star is over each. In the center, on the same side, is a lamb, lying on a book with seven seals, on which seals are, respectively, the same letters, though shown in this representation as the Roman equivalents. On the reverse side are two crossed swords, points upward; their hilts rest on an even balance. In the corners are the initials in Greek of the names of the Seven Churches (Revelation 2 and 3).  source: Scottish Rite 17th Degree

...the Masonic author of the authoritative Richardson's Monitor of Freemasonry, no doubt lets the cat out of the bag, so to speak, by detailing how, during this ritual ceremony for the Degree of Knight of the East and West, the Sacred Word is given to the assembled members of the Lodge. That sacred word is a shocker: It is Abaddon. Yes, Abaddon is the Sacred Word for the Masonic Knights of East and West. And the Holy Bible reveals exactly who Abaddon is in Revelation 9:11:

Revelation 9:11 And they had a king over them, which is the angel of the bottomless pit, whose name in the Hebrew tongue is Abaddon, but in the Greek tongue hath his name Apollyon.

In Richardson's Monitor of Freemasonry, it is revealed that, following the announcement of the sacred word, Abaddon, the Lodge drama for this fateful degree provides a demonstration 'intended to represent the end of the world'. (Marrs, Codex Magica, page 207) What symbol does Texe show to represent the Knights of East and West? A Skull & Crossbones! And, of course, the crossed bones represent an "X"! source: 17th Degree Knights of the East and West

There is really no denying that the Iglesia Ni Cristo logo is taken directly from the 17th Degree:



This also reveals that Iglesia Ni Cristo has a hidden agenda that involves the Antichrist and the end times. They picked the 17th Degree for a reason. The sacred word of the 17th Degree is Abaddon whom Revelation 9:11 tells us is Apollyon, the destroyer. That is what all of this is about. All of the 911, Freemason, false church cult business boils down to Antichrist.







Notice that in the Iglesia Ni Cristo logo the scrolls are all dishevelled. Even the masonic medal showed very clearly that there are seven seals. This signifies the fact that Iglesia Ni Cristo's role is as an agent of confusion within a masonic context.

The Lamb of God, Jesus, is associated with the seals in Revelation. Within the Iglesia Ni Cristo symbol the lamb is oblivious that it has been placed in a magic triangle as a sacrifice, so it makes a good analogy for those who attend Iglesia Ni Cristo. If the lamb was wise it would open and study its Bible, but it seems content to lay down on it and trust false teachers to interpret Scripture. Being ignorant of Christ it will be sacrificed to Antichrist. The occult symbolism of sacrifice is clear: 

Aleister Crowley, in Magick in Theory and Practice, said that "The ethics of the thing [blood sacrifice] appear to have concerned no one; nor, to tell the truth, need they do so." "Crowley sacrificed animals and fowl in his rituals within a MAGICK CIRCLE or MAGICK TRIANGLE, which prevented the energy from escaping. He condemned the practice of torturing the animal first to obtain an elemental slave, calling it "indefensible, utterly black magick of the very worst kind." However, he said that there was no objection to such black magic if it was "properly understood." source: Rosemary Guiley, The Encyclopedia of Magic and Alchemy  (p. 282)

At the top of the Iglesia Ni Cristo logo you will find the winged disk from Ancient Egypt, Assyria and Babylon:






The green, white and red shield conceals the face of the satanic god to whom the Hebrews would offer their children as a burnt offering. The designer of this gauche device made a pun in giving the owl known as Moloch (and as seen at Bohemian Grove) scales for eyes:





The colors present in the Iglesia Ni Cristo logo hint toward a connection to the Italian (home to the Vatican) flag with the red, green and white owl-faced shield. The odd double-lobed (like a human bottom) golden sunburst at the top and the golden scroll at the bottom point to the Vatican City flag:





Iglesia Ni Cristo reveals its Illuminati connection with the torch. The torch is a symbol of that moment when Eve received illicit knowledge from the serpent:

[caption id="attachment_2167" align="aligncenter" width="800"] Prometheus in Rockefeller Center versus the Iglesia Ni Cristo torch[/caption]

The allegory of Prometheus, who steals the divine fire as to allow men to proceed consciously on the path of spiritual evolution, thus transforming the most perfect of animals on Earth into a potential god, and making him free to take the kingdom of heaven by violence.  Hence also, the curse pronounced by Zeus against Prometheus, and by Jehovah against his ‘rebellious son,’ Satan. source: H.P. Blavatsky, The Secret Doctrine v. II (p. 244)

Thus Lucifer – the spirit of Intellectual Enlightenment and Freedom of Thought – is metaphorically the guiding beacon, which helps man to find his way through the rocks and sand banks of Life, for Lucifer is the Logos in his highest. source: H.P. Blavatsky,The Secret Doctrine v. II (p. 162)

Lucifer, the Light-bearer! Strange and mysterious name to give to the Spirit of Darkness!  Lucifer, the Son of the Morning!  Is it he who bears the Light, and with its splendors intolerable, blinds feeble, sensual, or selfish souls? Doubt it not! source: Albert Pike,  Morals and Dogma (p. 321)

The evidence I have seen in both the doctrine and symbols of Iglesia Ni Cristo tell me that someone who had a key role in its creation at the very least wanted to portray that they had ties to the occult and the Illuminati. From the apparent power of the group it seems that there is a measure of genuine Illuminati influence. 

There are just a couple of congruences between the Iglesia Ni Cristo logo and the Ecclesia Gnostica logo: 

Ecclesia Gnostica Catholica (E.G.C.), or the Gnostic Catholic Church, is the ecclesiastical arm of the Ordo Templi Orientis (O.T.O.), an international fraternal initiatory organization devoted to promulgating the Law of Thelema.

The chief function of Ecclesia Gnostica Catholica is the public and private performance of the Gnostic Mass (Liber XV), a eucharistic ritual written by Crowley in 1913.

About the Gnostic Mass, Crowley wrote in The Confessions of Aleister Crowley, "... the Ritual of the Gnostic Catholic Church ... I prepared for the use of the O.T.O., the central ceremony of its public and private celebration, corresponding to the Mass of the Roman Catholic Church." source: Gnostic Catholic Church of the O.T.O

However, there are too many common elements between the Iglesia Ni Cristo logo and the O.T.O. Lamen for the occurrence to be mere random chance:





What we must understand about the O.T.O. Lamen and all of these other images that seem to have copied it is that they all have their source in the legend of the Holy Grail. Those who hate Jesus began spreading the lie that Jesus did not die on the cross nor was he ever raised from the dead. The lie they tell is that Jesus had a sexual relationship with Mary Magdalene. The Grail myth represents the physical union of Jesus and Mary. Within the context of this myth various objects have been used to represent the sexual union. 

The Cup

Both the chalice/cup and the inverted triangle may be used to represent the vulva of Mary, which they call the Holy Grail:

This inverted triangle is also the figure of the heart and the cup, to which the heart is generally assimilated in symbolism, as we have shown in connection with the Holy Grail.  source: René Guénon, Fundamental Symbols: The Universal Language Of Sacred Science (p. 149)

In iconography, the heart takes on a vase-like shape, or is graphically represented as an inverted triangle, symbolizing something into which love is poured or carried; in this sense it is linked with the Holy Grail. source: Jack Tresidder, The Watkins Dictionary of Symbols

Da Vinci's The Last Supper could reflect the artist's beliefs regardnig the importance of Mary in Jesus' inner circle - that she was the wife of Jesus and was also the Holy Grail, a human chalice to contain the Savior's bloodline. source: Meera Lester, Mary Magdalene: The Modern Guide to the Bible's Most Mysterious And Misunderstood Woman (p. 40)

The Flame

There is very little documentation available regarding an explanation of these elements, but in regard to the flame, " A Flame at the top of the Chalice is the purified fire of Will which attracts congress with the Dove" (link). These people talk in circles and use lofty language to disguise hideous acts. The "Will" that is spoken of here needs to be placed into context. Aleister Crowley organized a religion called Thelema in the early 20th century: 

Thelema (/θəˈliːmə/) is a religion based on a philosophical law of the same name, which has been adopted as a central tenet by some religious organizations. The law of Thelema is "Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law. Love is the law, love under will." The law of Thelema was developed by Aleister Crowley, the early 20th-century English writer and ceremonial magician. source: Thelema

These people do not love anything. They serve Satan and his is the only "Will" in any such organization. When they say "purified fire of Will" they are talking about the fact that they have manifested the mind of Satan in themselves. This is what attracts the "dove". The dove in Christianity is known to represent the Holy Spirit, but in Satanism this dove is the spirit of Lucifer and the spirit of destruction:

What is more absurd and more impious that to give to the Devil, that is to say to Evil personified, the name Lucifer which signifies Light-bearer?

The intellectual Lucifer is the spirit of intelligence and love; it is the Paraclete, it is the Holy Spirit, and the physical Lucifer is the great agent of Universal Magnetism. source: Eliphas Levi & Louis Constant, Paradoxes of the Highest Science (p. 90)  - To CONTINUE READING PLS CLICK HERE.

Ecumenism: Spiritual Whoredom

Many people are being deceived not only by the Jesuits and the Vatican Luciferians but by many cults and false religions of the world. Their main message is to be UNITED that God the Creator can be found in many religions and faith and there are many roads to salvation... that you can be a Muslim and go to heaven or be a Hindu and still be saved. But is this what the Scripture is teaching? Obviously this is a lie... Jesus said that He is the ONLY way... There is no other way but to believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and be saved (john 14:6 KJV). Modern Ecumenism is a lie and a deception by Roman Catholics... Dont be deceived. Biblical Christianity is teaching us to be separated from the false religions of the world. Get out of her before its too late! Her masonic illuminati agents are working hard to get you out of the true teachings of the Messiah. True holiness is separation from the satanic system that is now working in the children of disobedience.