Trinitarians vs. Unitarians debate

Dr. James White and Dr. Michael Brown debate two who reject both the deity and preexistence of Christ. 

Some helpful videos: 'A Biblical Case for the Trinity in 5 minutes' : http://bit.ly/1TQ5awo 'The Trinity in a nutshell' : http://bit.ly/1Rnq0Q8 'Acts 2:38: Baptism for salvation? No!' : http://bit.ly/1ogIaIZ 'An Easy Way to Refute Oneness Pentecostalism' : http://bit.ly/1sGaDui 'The original Nicene Creed, modern translation with Scripture references' : http://bit.ly/1XGpajc 'Was the early church mostly oneness?' : http://bit.ly/20o6vdg 'A Brief History of Oneness Pentecostalism' : http://bit.ly/1TteUbh 'The apostle John was a Trinitarian' : http://bit.ly/1UBBF03 'Demonstrating the eternal Son from Scripture': http://bit.ly/1X6Ak4u 'Three persons in one context (verses)' : http://bit.ly/1UPK28f 'Does "Let Us Make Man" Prove the Trinity?' : http://bit.ly/1TUoFBw 'Debate: Trinity vs. Oneness (Smith vs. Ritchie)' : http://bit.ly/25uMkBi 

 Please support me and my ministry on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/trinityapolog... ANY amount would go a long way especially since I live in the Philippines. Even $1! And it's easy to sign up :-) I have plans to get married and enter full time ministry some day.

Kermit Zarley on Reformation

   

http://trinities.org/blog/podcast-200... This episode is the first part of my recent conversation with Christian author Kermit Zarley, author of The Restitution of Jesus Christ. 

 On this 500th anniversary of the Reformation, are we still fans of reforming? Or is reforming in light of scripture only acceptable in the distant past? 

 Also, did Luther and Calvin go far enough? Biblical unitarian Christians have long contended that our theology of the one God needs to be rolled back, past the catholic councils, to the Bible’s view that the one God just is the Father. While evangelicals’ official ideology is that all must be based on scripture, and that the Trinity is easily derived from the Bible, in fact, they habitually defer to catholic traditions, and generally refuse to debate whether or not the Trinity can be derived from the Bible. We briefly discuss the Trinity portion of the recent “Reforming Catholic Confession,” meant as a summation of what (nearly) all Protestants believe, and relate this to scriptural language about the one God, aka the Father, and also to God’s “spirit” in the Bible.

http://trinities.org/blog/podcast-201... In this second part of our conversation (part 1 is here http://trinities.org/blog/podcast-200...), author Kermit Zarley and I discuss the "Word" of John 1:1 and 1:14, the phrase "God the Son," why God might allow "the Church" to err on important subjects, and whether or not a Protestant can allow that he actually has. We also discuss the prospects for further reforming in this 21st century, whether or not unitarian Christianity has been proven a failure, and what is standing in the way of further reforming today. 

Links for this episode @ http://trinities.org/blog/podcast-201... 

 Kermit Zarley’s home page "How to Fact-Check Flaky Theology with the Bible?" 

The Restitution of Jesus Christ 

 Christianity Today magazine 

podcast 70 – The one God and his Son according to John

 podcast 191 – Ware’s Outline of the Testimony of Scripture Against the Trinity podcast 168 – The Death of Unitarian Congregationalism 

podcast 167 – Lamson’s History of The Unitarian Congregationalists 

biblicalunitarian.com 

 21st Century Reformation Online 

 Christian Monotheism 

 This week's thinking music is: "A Mighty Fortress is our God"

 Weekly podcast exploring views about the Trinity, and more generally about God and Jesus in Christian theology and philosophy. Debates, interviews, and historical and contemporary perspectives. Hosted by philosopher of religion / analytic theologian Dr. Dale Tuggy. 

 This week's thinking music is: "A Mighty Fortress is our God" https://archive.org/details/AMightyFo...

LUCIFER'S VAULT AND MAMMON.

Question: "What is mammon?"

Answer: The word mammon comes from the Greek word mammonas. Similar root words exist in Hebrew, Latin, Aramaic, Chaldean and Syriac. They all translate to “money, wealth, and material possessions.”

In biblical culture the word mammon often carried a negative connotation. It was sometimes used to describe all lusts and excesses: gluttony, greed, and dishonest worldly gain. Ultimately, mammon described an idol of materialism, which many trusted as a foundation for their world and philosophy. While the King James Version retains the term Mammon in Matthew 6:24, other versions translate the Greek as “money,” “wealth,” or “riches.”

The city of Babylon (Revelation 18), with all its avarice and greed, is a description of a world given over to the spirit of Mammon. Some scholars cite Mammon as the name of a Syrian and Chaldean god, similar to the Greek god of wealth, Plutus.

Just as Wisdom is personified in Proverbs 1:21–33, Mammon is personified in Matthew 6:24 and Luke 16:13. Jesus’ words here show a powerful contrast between the worship of the material world and the worship of God. Later, writers such as Augustine, Danté (The Divine Comedy), Milton (Paradise Lost), and Spenser (The Faerie Queene) used personifications of Mammon to show the insidious nature of materialism and its seduction of humanity.

Worship of mammon can show up in many ways. It isn’t always through a continual lust for more money. When we envy others’ wealth, are anxious over potentially unmet needs, disobey God’s directives about the use of wealth, or fail to trust God’s love and faithfulness, our thinking is out of balance concerning material wealth.

In the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus teaches about our relationship to material goods. He says, “Do not store up for yourselves treasures on earth. . . . But store up for yourselves treasures in heaven. . . . For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also. . . . No one can serve two masters. Either you will hate the one and love the other, or you will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve both God and money [mammon]” (Matthew 6:19–24).

The apostle Paul writes of the godly perspective toward mammon: “godliness with contentment is great gain. For we brought nothing into the world, and we can take nothing out of it. But if we have food and clothing, we will be content with that. Those who want to get rich fall into temptation and a trap and into many foolish and harmful desires that plunge people into ruin and destruction. For the love of money is a root of all kinds of evil. Some people, eager for money, have wandered from the faith and pierced themselves with many griefs” (1 Timothy 6: 6–10).

Solomon writes of the futility of chasing after mammon: “Whoever loves money never has enough; whoever loves wealth is never satisfied with their income. This too is meaningless” (Ecclesiastes 5:10). Lust of any kind is insatiable, no matter how much time or effort is poured into the pursuit of the object of lust.

In Luke 16:14–15, Jesus rebukes those who refused to hear His admonition to choose God over mammon: “The Pharisees, who loved money, heard all this and were sneering at Jesus. He said to them, ‘You are the ones who justify yourselves in the eyes of others, but God knows your hearts. What people value highly is detestable in God’s sight.’”

The parable of the rich fool (Luke 12:13–21) is the story of a man who lives to increase his wealth yet in the end he loses his soul because he “is not rich toward God” (verse 21). Mark 4:19 warns of the deceitfulness of mammon and its ability to “choke the Word, making it unfruitful.”

Mammon cannot produce peace in us, and it certainly cannot produce righteousness. A love of money shows we are out of balance in our relationship to God. Proverbs 8:18 speaks of true, lasting riches: “With me [Wisdom] are riches and honor, enduring wealth and prosperity.” Jesus teaches us in Matthew 6:19–34 to not worry about our physical needs, about houses or clothes or food, but to “seek first his kingdom and his righteousness, and all these things will be given to you as well” (verse 33).
SOURCE: https://www.gotquestions.org/what-is-mammon.html

The Vatican is Behind World’s Top Banks, Governments, Global Companies & Your Mortgage! 

Is the Vatican behind the Mortgage mess?

“Ye are able upon earth to give and take away empires, kingdoms, principalities, marquisates, duchies, courtships, and the possessions of all men . . .” — Pope Gregory VII speaking of the papacy (1073).

The Vatican is the strongest push for banking anywhere in the world. When it comes to moving money, or not moving money, they are the Key.
The Bank of England. That’s where they came from. Everything is a promissory note to the Bank of England. The Federal Reserve doesn’t come close.


Let’s take a moment to follow the “money” allegedly in your jeans.

Where do U.S. banks get their marching orders? From the Federal Reserve that is constantly in the news setting the interest rates that charge or cripple economies.

Often seen as a government agency, the “Fed” is actually a privately held, for profit bank that supposedly stands ready to make good on even the dodgiest loans made by U.S. banks that must hold in reserve only 10% of the money they loan.

This “fractional reserve banking” means banks can create mortgages and other loans out of thin air? [No! Promissory Notes*]. Another word for this is fraud.

In usurping the Constitution, which reserves the sole right to mint U.S. currency at zero interest, the illegal Federal Reserve Act passed during Congressional recess for Christmas in 1913 essentially enslaved Americans and their successive government under a mountain of compounding war debts before being exported as a model worldwide.


The Federal Reserve Act was created in London by Baron Alfred Rothschild. Its final draft was decided at a secret meeting of heavy financial hitters held at J.P. Morgan’s Jekyll Island estate in Georgia. Among those present were Senator Nelson Aldrich, Assistant Secretary of the Treasury, Paul Warburg, and several senior officials of J.P. Morgan’s banks. [Secrets of the Federal Reserves The Creature from Jekyll Island].

Hold on, advises G. Edward Griffin, author of the Creature From Jekyll Island. We had The Morgans; The Rockefellers; Kuhn, Loeb & Company; The Rothschilds; and the Warburgs. They were the major competitors in the field of investment and banking in those days; these were the giants.
Prior to this period they were beating their heads against each other, blood all over the battlefield, fighting for dominance in the financial markets of the world. And here they are sitting around a table coming to an agreement of some kind.What is going on here?
They came together completely and decided not to compete — They formed a cartel, to print money, collect taxes, and charge interest to the U.S. Government and other borrowing banks on loans made from nothing [No! Promissory Notes*].

With his extensive European banking savvy, Warburg was one of the more knowledgeable bankers in the group. Voicing the Jesuit agenda, this non-ordained “cohort” will later tell the Senate: “We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent.”
The main problem, as Paul Warburg informed his colleagues, was to avoid the name “Central Bank”. For that reason, he had decided upon the designation of “Federal Reserve System”. This would deceive the people.

This patent removal of the system from Congressional control meant that the Federal Reserve proposal was unconstitutional from its inception.

And Morgan? John Pierpoint Morgan was born in 1837 during the first money panic in the United States, said to have been caused by the House of Rothschild. It was this family who later bailed out Morgan’s bank, uniting both houses. [Secrets of the Federal Reserve].
By June 1932, Congressman Louis McFadden was fed up with the Fed: “We have in this country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks . . . private credit monopolies which prey upon the people of the United States for the benefit of themselves.”

The Chair of the House Committee on Banking and Currency told the House of Representatives: “The United States has been ransacked and pillaged . . . The truth is the Federal Reserve Board has usurped the Government of the United States. It controls everything to supply financial power to an international super state — a superstate controlled by international bankers and international industrialists acting together to enslave the world.


Meeting in private with the presidents of the 12 Federal Reserve Banks, the Federal Reserve Board of Governors controls all economic activity throughout the United States, creating money out of nothing [No! Promissory Notes*] and manipulating money markets and employment by setting interest rates for the billions of dollars in government bonds floated daily to keep a seriously bankrupt economy afloat.

Since those 12 Federal Reserve Banks are meant to be “unknown to the public” lets name them: Rothschild Bank of London; Warburg Bank of Hamburg; Rothschild Bank of Berlin; Lehman Bank of New York; Lazard Brothers of Paris; Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York; Israel Moses Seif Banks of Italy; Goldman Sachs of New York; Warburg Bank of Amsterdam; Chase Manhattan Bank of New York.

Those dollars in your wallet are actually “Federal Reserve Notes”. These “promises to pay” are not “money”. Regardless of denomination, each bill printed by the Bureau of Printing and Engraving in D.C., on contract from the privately held Federal Reserve, is actually worth exactly three-tenths of one penny. No wonder the Fed’s founder Nathan Rothschild, once boasted: “Permit me to issue and control the money of a nation, and I care not who makes the laws.”
The privately printed thousand dollar bills streaming in sheets off the presses become “liabilities and obligations” of the United States Government, and are added to its present [$19] trillion dollar debt. The government had no debt when the Federal Reserve Act was passed in 1913.” [Secrets of the Federal Reserve].

In case you are wondering, the never properly ratified U.S. Income Tax was also introduced by busy bankers in 1913 as the only means to finance the war and ensure perpetual profits from providing public and corporate debt.

The U.S. “Federal Income Tax” is not “federal” either. According to attorney, author and federal witness, Paul Andrew Mitchell: “After much diligent research, several investigators have concluded that there is no known Act of Congress, nor any Executive Order, giving the IRS lawful jurisdiction to operate within any of the 50 States of the Union. When all evidence is examined objectively, the IRS appears to be a money laundering extortion racket, and conspiracy to engage in a pattern of racketeering activity in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1951 and 1961, et seq.

In other words, it is an organized crime syndicate operating under false and fraudulent pretenses. As Eustace Mullins helpfully explains: “The IRS is actually a private collection agency for the Federal Reserve System. It originated as the Black Hand in medieval Italy, collectors of debt by force and extortion for the ruling Italian mob families.

All personal income taxes collected by the IRS are rrquired by law to be deposited in the nearest Federal Reserve Bank. In other words, into the pockets of the Rothschilds, Warburgs, Schiffs, Rockefellers, Harrimans, Morgans, and other elite families. But don’t try to buy any of this hot Fed stock. The Federal Reserve Act stipulates that the stock of the Federal Reserve Banks cannot be bought or sold on any stock exchange.

It is passed only by inheritance as the fortune of the “big rich”; Mullins states “Almost half of the owners of Federal Reserve Bank stock are not Americans.” These “foreign” owners include the Fed’s originators, the Vatican Jesuits.

“In a country where there are Jesuits, they must either rule or the country must go to ruin… it is they who rule the world.” — Luigi Desanctis, official Censer of the Inquisition, Protestant Reformation pastor (1852).


The Great Depression put all the smaller banks out of business and made the Federal Reserve Bank “Lord of all:” — Eric Phelps documents.

Guess who helped trigger the Great Depression? According to FDR’s son-in-law, it was a Knight of Malta named Joseph Kennedy. As Curtis Dall relates: “The feeling around the Street, in succeeding months, was that there were, in particular, three large short sells of stock, allegedly, Tom Bragg, Ben Smith, and Joe Kennedy. Of the three mentioned well-known short sellers, Joe Kennedy was allegedly the most important, the most powerful and the most successful… Was Joe Kennedy carefully selected by world money leaders to sell short? Today the largest bank in the world today, the Federal Reserve “is one of the greatest contributors, or players, in international trading” Mullins observes.

The Fed gets its orders from the Queen Mum of all Banks, the Bank of England — aka, the Bank of Rothschild considered by many to be the world’s most powerful institution. The power behind all presidencies, dictatorships, and thrones.

Does the Bank of England answer to any other bank? Well, yes, actually. The Bank of Rome began opening branch offices in Venice in 1587.

Bank of Rome = Vatican Bank controlled by the Jesuit General, aka the “Black Pope”.
The Jesuit Bank of Rome opened its Bank of England branch in 1694. The first bank to be named after a country, the Bank of England has nothing to do with the British Government — except to own it through privately held, interest-compounded debt.

Unaccountable to either the Queen or Parliament, the misleadingly labeled “Bank of England” finances the throne, the British prime minister, Parliament and much of the planet out of “The City” located in central London. All major British banks have their main offices in this “Square Mile” — as well as 70 U.S. Banks. Throw in the London Stock Exchange, Lloyds of London, the Baltic Exchange (shipping), Fleet Street (publishing and Newspapers), the London Commodity and Metal exchanges and you are looking at Earth’s financial axis. [Descent into Slavery].

The City operates as a sovereign state, just like the Vatican. Since 1820, the Rothschilds have traditionally chosen The City’s Lord Mayor.

Back in the U.S.A., as author Eric Phelps explained in an interview just before publication of his secrecy-shredding “Vatican Assassins”. The Vatican’s Black Robes “own and control” the Federal Reserve Bank “by proxy” through the Knights of Malta, with their various trusts and so on. They never own anything outright; they always own it through a trusted third party including the Vatican home mortgage connection.

All Roads lead to Rome.

We have the Federal Reserve begat by the Bank of England begat by the Bank of Rome. Similarly, the Bank of Canada is an offspring of the Bank of England, which in turn is a child of the Bank of Rome. aka, the Vatican Bank. And the Vatican, as everyone “knows” is run by the CNN-featured “White” Pope. So who runs the White Pope?

Anonymous: “And then they want you to respect them. Respect their religion. Religion is not to be respected. You uncover the truth. You say the truth no matter what.”

……………………………….
*Bank Credit is exchanged for Promissory Notes. [The real owner of the promissory note creates the credit and mistakenly GIVES it to the bank, in return for a bank deposit or bank check].
Source: Maine Republic

Lucifer's Vault and the Rotschild.

The Rothschilds are a prominent family, originally from Germany, that established banking and finance houses in Europe beginning in the 18th century. Pioneers in providing capital for business, financing infrastructure projects such as railways and the Suez Canal, the Rothschilds molded the way the international world of high finance works today. The family is a frequent target of anti-Semitic conspiracy theories. The Rothschild Empire had its genesis during the 1760s when Mayer Amschel Rothschild (1744-1812) founded a banking business in his native Frankfurt, in the German duchy of Hesse. Over time and with the help of Mayer Rothschild’s five sons, the family business expanded throughout several European countries. During 1815 and 1914, the Rothschilds controlled the world’s largest bank.

TODAY: The name Rothschild is literally associated with wealth. For over 200 years, the Rothschild family have remained the most powerful and wealthy family in the world. Their wealth has been made primarily in the world of banking. However, they have massive investments in other industries such as real estate, oil and construction. The Rothschild family has frequently been the subject of conspiracy theoriesThese theories take differing forms, such as claiming that the family controls the world’s wealth and financial institutions or encouraged or discouraged wars between governments. We will let you draw your own conclusions on this.

 HOW EXACTLY DOES THE ROTHSCHILD FAMILY RULE THE USA? - Read the whole article HERE.

LUCIFER'S VAULT AND THE RICHES OF THIS WORLD.

"...the devil taketh him up into an exceeding high mountain, and sheweth him all the kingdoms of the world, and the glory of them; And saith unto him, All these things will I give thee, if thou wilt fall down and worship me. Then saith Jesus unto him, Get thee hence, Satan: for it is written, Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and him only shalt thou serve." - MATTHEW 4:8-10KJV

The Jesuits and the global finance system

Because today, the true dominant global wealth of the Roman Catholic Church is so well hidden behind hundreds of thousands of trusts, companies, cross ownerships and secretive laws, any discussion regarding the complete control of the Catholic Church and the global financial system is difficult to fathom with any credibility.

Automatically, the natural reaction is to classify such discussions as conspiracy. In truth, the global financial system that we know today and the world economy would not have occurred, if not for the events that saw firstly the Jesuits disbanded, a war resulting in the assassination of two Popes before finally the Jesuits achieving a lasting treaty from 1814 onwards and the restatement of the most powerful order in church history.

Unlike the greedy Popes, the Jesuits saw the vast wealth of the church as a strategic asset that could be used more precisely to ferment revolution, finance war, change governments and defeat their long time non-Catholic enemies.

Again, unlike the insular Popes, the Jesuits had seen the power and success of using business and finance to build influence through its phenomenally successful relationships in Japan, other parts of Asia, Russia and the Americas.

The Jesuits had the first hand experience of the pioneers of the modern finance system, the English Protestants ( Jesuit insiders within this movement) in the 17th Century as a case history in the power of finance to power the rapid expansion of an Empire.

Banks and in particular Private Banks were also a powerful tool for achieving strategic objectives and also provided an effective means of hiding the wealth of the Vatican, both from the Pope (from whom it was initially stolen) and from other forces.

In banks and the establishment of the global finance network, the Jesuits discovered for the first time a means by which they could literally play two or more sides against one another, without anyone being the wiser, excluding the bankers of course, and at the same time make money from funding the conflict.

In the past, Jesuits had focused primarily on assassination and court influence, both fraught with great personal peril. But in building the global financial network, allied with loyal families, themselves aligned to the ancient Jewish noble families, the Jesuits could effectively start huge wars and never risk direct implication.

Founded Name Nation Status
1602 Dutch East India Company Netherlands Private
1672 Hoares UK Bank
1690 Barclays UK Private
1692 Coutts UK Bank
1694 Bank of England UK Central
1695 Bank of Scotland UK Bank
1727 Royal Bank of Scotland UK Bank
1741 Wegelin Switzerland Bank
1755 Bank Leu Switzerland Bank
1762 Hope & Co Netherlands Private
1784 Bank of New York USA Bank
1787 La Roche Switzerland Bank
1796 Lombard Odier Darier Hentsch Switzerland Bank
1796 Darier Hentsch & Cie Switzerland Private
1799 Bank of the Manhattan Company (now JP Morgan Chase Bank) USA Private
1800 Rothschild Germany Private
1805 Pictet Switzerland Bank
1762/1806 Barings Brothers & Co Bank UK Private
1812 City Bank of New York (now CitiBank) USA Private
1816 Mirabaud Switzerland Bank
1817 Bank of Montreal Canada Bank
1818 J. Henry Shroeder Bank Germany Private
1820 Nordea Sweden Bank
1822 DnB NOR Norway Bank
1824 Algemene Bank Nederland (now ABN AMRO) Netherlands Private
1828 Centreville Bank USA Bank
1832 Scotiabank Canada Bank
1839 Hambros France Bank
1848 Lazard USA Bank
1850 HSBC Hong Kong Bank
1854 Swiss Bank Corporation (now UBS AG) Switzerland Private
1856 Credit Suisse Switzerland Private
1860 J. P. Morgan (now JP Morgan Chase Bank) USA Private
1863 Crédit Lyonnais (now Credit Agricole) France Private
1863/71 Amsterdam-Rotterdam Bank (now ABN AMRO) Netherlands Private
1864 Société Générale France Private
1870 Handlowy w Warszawie SA Poland Bank
1870 Deutsche Bank Germany Private
1870 Chase National Bank (now JP Morgan Chase Bank) USA Bank
1904 American Bank of Italy (Now Bank of America) USA Bank
1912 Union Bank of Switzerland (now UBS AG) Switzerland Private
1913 Federal Reserve Bank USA Private
1930 Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Switzerland Private

The important pattern to note is the general groupings of dates of bank formation and their significance. The first is the formation of banks by English Protestants ( Jesuit insiders) during the end of the 17th Century. This marks a watershed moment in the economic architecture of the first phase of the British Empire.

The second pattern is the grouping of banks formed in the Netherlands and Switzerland just prior to the suppression of the Jesuits around 1767 by Portugal, Italy, France and Spain.

The third pattern is the grouping of banks formed during the active suppression of the Jesuits and their war with the Vatican and Popes from 1773 to 1818 in the United States, Switzerland, Germany and the United Kingdom.

This group of banks created during the Vatican-Jesuit War is probably the most historically influential, secretive, political of any group of banks in human history. Almost all of them have been implicated in an assortment of allegations from funding of wars, crimes against humanity, treason and money laundering.

The Darier Hentsch & Cie Bank (1796, Switzerland) was the bank that happened to fund Napoleon his European Wars that saw the Papal States and influence of the Vatican crippled.

The Rothschilds (1800, Germany) are famous for suddenly acquiring massive wealth almost overnight and then proceeding to fund numerous European Wars, Asian Wars including World War I.

Barings Bank (1802, UK) is famous for organizing the purchase of Lousiana by the United States from Napoleon during his war with Britain.

City Bank of New York (now CitiBank) (1812) is famous for helping finance the North side of the Civil War, US involvement in World War II, US business in Nazi Germany and US involvement in World War II.

J. Henry Shroeder Bank (1818, Germany) is famous for being the almost exclusive bank for the Nazis.

Of the top 20 banks of the world today, over half originate from the period 1760 to 1860 which saw the Jesuits disperse the massive wealth of the Catholic Church to all parts of the globe, especially great influxes into the United States.

In terms of Private Banks, in 1986, the total asset value held was said to be US$4,300 Billion. In 1997, the figure has more than doubled to $10,000 Billion. In year 2000 alone, the figure hit $13,600 Billion trillion, and is currently still growing at a rate of 30 percent per year. The current estimate of total asset value of deposits held by private banks is around $17,000 Billion.

The Federal Reserve Bank and the Catholic Church
Indirectly, the most valuable banking investment of the Roman Catholic Church is its investment control of the Federal Reserve Banks of the United States.

Through a highly complex arrangement of small holdings across sometimes thousands of banks and cross-ownership holdings hiding foreign ownership, the Catholic Church has effectively controlled the Federal Reserve Bank and therefore the destiny of the United States economy since the turn of the 20th Century.

The Catholic Church has only ordered the complete pulling of the plug of the United States economy once in 1929 to the early 1930's effectively grinding the economy to a halt during the Great Depression along with Europe.

While an extremely high risk strategy that could have caused another Civil War in the United States, the action was necessary to generate suitable conditions of poverty in Europe for the rise of Catholic appointed dictators in Germany, Spain, Italy as well as South America. Without the deliberate action of the Catholic controlled banks, the Great Depression would not had happened and by default World War II would not have taken place.

Since its formation, only one President of the United States --a Catholic himself --has attempted to override the power of the Federal Reserve and the Roman Catholic Church by ordering the US Treasury to print its own money. The money was destroyed the day after he ceased to be President. His name was John F. Kennedy.

Putting it all together
Putting all this together, you can see that there is a lot more to who actually controls the wealth of the world and the actions they dictate from time to time that affect whether we will have a job, a home and food to eat.

At the very least we can blame the US Federal Reserve in part --also realizing that this organization remains essentially a set of private trusts holding the US public and the world to ransom with its decisions. Indeed, it is an institution heavily influenced by its Catholic masters.

Yes, collectively we all borrowed too much money. But in reality all we did was ask for a little of the massive wealth stolen and held by others such as the Vatican and the Jesuits to flow through their banks and into our pockets. We weren't really borrowing, just finding a way to get back some of what is rightfully ours in the first place.

The sub prime crisis should never have happened. The Federal reserve could of easily contained the problem and stopped it in 2008. Instead, against all logic they let it get substantially worse.

The answer to the fundamental question of why? why throw the world back into a depression again after 70 years requires a fresh article--an article that explains the structure of the global banking system controlled by the Vatican and Jesuits and how they started to "turn off the credit taps" by Christmas time 2008.- Taken from The Jesuit Continiuum - the Systems, Memes and History. AVAILABLE ONLINE HERE. - http://thejesuitcontinuumomegapoint.blogspot.com/


 

 The Fact of the matter is quite clear to see, the Rothschild's are nothing more than bankers for the Black Pope. All evidence points to this fact. The Rothschild's . This video should hopefully explain the power structure with sufficient detail to completely eradicate and forever expunge the daft notion that the Rothschild's .

THE MOB ON STEROIDS (the rise of the zionist state)

 

 

 

THE MOB ON STEROIDS . . .

When I say the mob on steroids I am talking about power and what's called the ruling elite, the aristocrats, royalty, empire and so on. Who do the elite rule over? The peasants, the common man, the people, the masses, the pawns in the struggle for power. This is the natural order of things on this earth, this planet. What makes humanity divine (so to speak) is that we as a species question the natural order of things, i.e. religion, humanitarianism, spiritualism, civilization, etc, etc. Rather we have the capacity to question! This questioning is what constitutes truth, for power is ruthless, and to question power is to expose their ruthlessness. What I have done ever since I can remember is question power, or in reality life itself. To the powerful the philosopher is seen as dangerous, and subversive, Jesus Christ, or Malcolm X are both good examples of subversives. You really don't have to guess why both of these men were crucified and hated. The most organized, at this time in history, of the elite are the Zionist Jews, they took over (so to speak) humanity's or rather the elite's organized crime syndicates. This is what JFK was talking about when he spoke truth to power in his secret society speech; by the way Kennedy was another "subversive".

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_co...

All is not hopeless or nihilistic in my perceptions of our world, no quite the contrary. The very thing that makes our world complicated, or ugly as it pertains to our species, is the very thing that makes us responsible for what and who we are. Unlike let us say the great apes, rats, or trees for that matter. That thing, is our capacity to change, to question ourselves, and the way we behave. Within this capacity lies the potential to change our world for the better. What gives me hope, is that power presently hides itself in a facade of false flags, victim hood and good works, i.e. the war on terror. This is a sea change compared to the old days of Attila the Hun, or the Roman Empire. No, what we have today, is empire or power elitism by stealth. The people's consciousness has changed enough to where the power elite, can no longer declare themselves an empire upon which the sun never sets. There are those whom will most likely flag this essay as hate speech or Anti Semitic, and that is quite telling in and of itself, as to who and what constitutes the power elite today, or what I call THE MOB ON STEROIDS . . .

 

 * If you appreciate my work, and would like to support my channel you can do so here https://www.paypal.me/NDeVincenzo468 thank you . . .

R.C. Sproul Memorial Service

Teacher, professor, pastor, author, husband, father, grandfather, friend, servant of God and His people—Dr. Robert Charles Sproul, better known to many simply as R.C., was all of these things and more. Having finished his race on earth, Dr. Sproul has gone on to his reward, and we now celebrate his legacy of faithful service to Christ and His church. 

After his conversion during his freshman year in college, R.C. served Christ for more than sixty years. Never one to stand down when the gospel itself was at stake, R.C. tirelessly labored to defend the sufficiency of God’s grace alone for our salvation as well as the trustworthiness of the Word of God. Yet in all this, he remained the consummate happy warrior, his infectious humor and generous spirit on full display. His bold stand for the truth evidenced the confidence he had in the sovereignty of the Lord.

 R.C. was a uniquely gifted communicator, and his ability to make complex topics easy to understand was evident throughout his teaching. God in His grace used him to awaken men and women around the world to the holiness of God, and his legacy is evident not only in the vast body of work he leaves behind but in the countless people whose understanding of God’s majestic character was deepened because they sat under his teaching. 

As we reflect on R.C.’s life and legacy, we give glory to God for using R.C. to advance His kingdom on earth. We honor R.C. best by carrying on his mission to help as many people as possible understand the character of God and rest by faith alone in Jesus Christ.

 Learn more at RCSproul.com

JEWSUIT AGAINST MESSIANIC JEWS 2018

"Will Israel ever accept Messianic Jews? - Indeed, Messianic Jews are largely shunned by mainstream Jewish communities around the world, and are commonly seen as proselytizers. 

In recent times, tension between Israel’s rabbinate and the liberal streams of Judaism both at home and abroad have been in the spotlight due to disputes over religious pluralism. But another group, Messianic Jews, is continuously ostracized both by mainstream world Jewry and by Israel.

Every now and again a story reaches the media about a self-identified Jew whose application for immigration to Israel, or aliya, has been denied on the basis that he or she is a Messianic Jew.

Supreme Court of Israel. (photo credit: Wikimedia Commons)

 The Law of Return was enacted by the Knesset in 1950.

In 1970, Amendment 4A (a) to the Law of Return was passed, stating: “The rights of a Jew under this Law and the rights of an oleh under the Nationality Law, 5712-1952, as well as the rights of an oleh under any other enactment, are also vested in a child and a grandchild of a Jew, the spouse of a Jew, the spouse of a child of a Jew and the spouse of a grandchild of a Jew, except for a person who has been a Jew and has voluntarily changed his/her religion.”

In 1989, the Supreme Court ruled that Messianic Jews’ belief in Jesus makes them Christians, thus ineligible for automatic Israeli citizenship.

That ruling, however, was left open to future changes. “The ‘secular test’ is composed of various elements, and it is possible to enumerate between them the foundations of the Jewish religion, the Hebrew language, the history of the Jewish people and the rebuilding of its independence in its state. The internal weight of these elements has changed over time, and will change in the future. The secular-liberal conception is a dynamic concept that changes with the Jewish people’s path over history,” it reads.

In April 2008, the court ruled that several Messianic Jews were entitled to Israeli citizenship because they were the descendants of Jewish fathers or grandfathers, but had never been Jewish themselves, and thus had not converted.

“The question is whether the Law of Return is still suitable to current needs,” a source familiar with the issue tells the Post.

He says the situation is complicated for those who are in the “twilight zone of religions,” between Judaism and Christianity, for example, or those who converted under duress in order to save their lives. “The law has no answer to that. Nobody has given it any thought and nobody wants to touch the Law of Return, for fear that it will jeopardize the very foundation of the justification of Zionism.

“The absurd thing is that if they join a friendship association with Israel in the West, they will be very welcomed by Israel as friends, just like any Friends of Israel Christian group,” he adds, “although I believe that they would be shunned by local communities because they are too ambiguous about their Judaism, and communities in general are not afraid anymore of Christian Friends or even Muslim Friends but are very weary of all those who are in between.”

Indeed, Messianic Jews are largely shunned by mainstream Jewish communities around the world, and are commonly seen as proselytizers.

“The term ‘Jews for Jesus’ – and probably even ‘Messianic Jews’ – is a bit disingenuous,” says Rabbi David Rosen, adviser on interreligious affairs to the Chief Rabbinate of Israel, who also serves as the director of the American Jewish Committee’s Department of Interreligious Affairs.

“If people believe Jesus is one of the triune persons of God, then they should be honest as identifying themselves as Christian.

Therefore, they can identify themselves as ethnically Jewish Christians or Jewish Christians if they want. But they are Christian,” he tells the Post. “Part of the problem with those who use these terminologies is that it’s very often for missionary proselytizing purposes.... That, I think, is the major source of distress for the Jewish community, where they are seen as predatory in their religious approach and disingenuous in their terminology.”

Addressing arguments that the situation of descendants of Holocaust survivors and those targeted by antisemites should be taken into account, Rosen says: “I sympathize with their plight but think it’s ridiculous to suggest that antisemitism, let alone Nazism, should determine who is considered a Jew.”

This question, in his opinion, should not be in the hands of the state at all.

“From my point of view, the state should not be interfering in questions of people’s identity at all. It should not be going into the business of who is a Jew, let alone what is a Jew,” he asserts. “The state itself originally, prior the Law of Return, followed Ben-Gurion’s approach that anyone who wants to consider themselves as a Jews should be seen as a Jew.”

He also opined that the state, as a secular democracy, should not be preferring one group over another.

“Most Jews believe the Law of Return should still remain as a declarative testimony of the fact that Israel is a home for Jews everywhere in the world. But it is very dubious as to whether the Law of Return should be defining exactly who is a Jew,” he says, noting that in his opinion, the duty of absorbing immigrants should be the responsibility of an organization of the Jewish people, such as the Jewish Agency.

There are an estimated 20,000 Messianic Jewish believers in Israel, and an estimated 350,000 worldwide.

Scharf says very few Messianic Jews apply for aliya from abroad, but the Jewish Agency does not have data on those who apply to immigrate while already residing in Israel. The Population and Immigration Bureau says it does not have statistics specifically for Messianic Jews.

The Messianic Jewish Alliance of Israel declined a request for an interview." - excerpts from Will Israel ever accept Messianic Jews? -  By Tamara Zieve
December 16, 2017 04:33 http://www.jpost.com/Israel-News/Diaspora-Affairs-Will-Israel-ever-accept-Messianic-Jews-518129  The Jerusalem Post

Martin Luther a Racist Anti-Semite? - Q&A RC Sproul & Voddie Baucham

 "That Jesus Christ Was Born a Jew" (1523) - excerpts http://www.ligonier.org by Martin Luther

 1.
 A new lie about me is being circulated. I am supposed to have preached and written that Mary, the mother of God, was not a virgin either before or after the birth of Christ, but that she conceived Christ through Joseph, and had more children after that. Above and beyond all this, I am supposed to have preached a new heresy, namely, that Christ was [through Joseph] the seed of Abraham. How these lies tickle my good friends, the papists! Indeed, because they condemn the gospel it serves them right that they should have to satisfy and feed their heart's delight and joy with lies. I would venture to wager my neck that none of those very liars who allege such great things in honor of the mother of God believes in his heart a single one of these articles. Yet with their lies they pretend that they are greatly concerned about the Christian faith.

 But after all, it is such a poor miserable lie that I despise it and would rather not reply to it. In these past three years I have grown quite accustomed to hearing lies, even from our nearest neighbors. And they in turn have grown accustomed to the noble virtue of neither blushing nor feeling ashamed when they are publicly convicted of lying. They let themselves be chided as liars, yet continue their lying. Still they are the best Christians, striving with all that they have and are to devour the Turk and to extirpate all heresy.

 Since for the sake of others, however, I am compelled to answer these lies, I thought I would also write something useful in addition, so that I do not vainly steal the reader's time with such dirty rotten business. Therefore, I will cite from Scripture the reasons that move me to believe that Christ was a Jew born of a virgin, that I might perhaps also win some Jews to the Christian faith. Our fools, the popes, bishops, sophists, and monks-the crude asses' heads-have hitherto so treated the Jews that anyone who wished to be a good Christian would almost have had to become a Jew. If I had been a Jew and had seen such dolts and blockheads govern and teach the Christian faith, I would sooner have become a hog than a Christian.

2.
They have dealt with the Jews as if they were dogs rather than human beings; they have done little else than deride them and seize their property. When they baptize them they show them nothing of Christian doctrine or life, but only subject them to popishness and monkery. When the Jews then see that Judaism has such strong support in Scripture, and that Christianity has become a mere babble without reliance on Scripture, how can they possibly compose themselves and become right good Christians? I have myself heard from pious baptized Jews that if they had not in our day heard the gospel they would have remained Jews under the cloak of Christianity for the rest of their days. For they acknowledge that they have never yet heard anything about Christ from those who baptized and taught them.

 I hope that if one deals in a kindly way with the Jews and instructs them carefully from Holy Scripture, many of them will become genuine Christians and turn again to the faith of their fathers, the prophets and patriarchs. They will only be frightened further away from it if their Judaism is so utterly rejected that nothing is allowed to remain, and they are treated only with arrogance and scorn. If the apostles, who also were Jews, had dealt with us Gentiles as we Gentiles deal with the Jews, there would never have been a Christian among the Gentiles. Since they dealt with us Gentiles in such brotherly fashion, we in our turn ought to treat the Jews in a brotherly manner in order that we might convert some of them. For even we ourselves are not yet all very far along, not to speak of having arrived.
 

When we are inclined to boast of our position we should remember that we are but Gentiles, while the Jews are of the lineage of Christ. We are aliens and in-laws; they are blood relatives, cousins, and brothers of our Lord. Therefore, if one is to boast of flesh and blood, the Jews are actually nearer to Christ than we are, as St. Paul says in Romans 9[:5]. God has also demonstrated this by his acts, for to no nation among the Gentiles has he granted so high an honor as he has to the Jews. For from among the Gentiles there have been raised up no patriarchs, no apostles, no prophets, indeed, very few genuine Christians either. And although the gospel has been proclaimed to all the world, yet He committed the Holy Scriptures, that is, the law and the prophets, to no nation except the Jews, as Paul says in Romans 3[:2] and Psalm 147[:19-20], "He declares his word to Jacob, his statutes and ordinances to Israel. He has not dealt thus with any other nation; nor revealed his ordinances to them....

Robert C. Sproul 1939 - 2017

“If there is one maverick molecule in all the universe, then God is not sovereign. And if God is not sovereign, He is not God.” - R.C. Sproul

 Ang isa sa mga Amerikanong Teologo na "Reformed" at kilala sa buong mundo na guro, mangangaral sa himpapawid, sa telebisyon, maging sa masang Amerikano. Isang manunulat, pastor, at apolohetika. Nagtatag ng Ligonier Ministries noong taon 1971 ngunit  ngayon ay sumakabilang buhay na kahapon dahil sa sakit na “severe respiratory difficulties exacerbated by the flu and complicated by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).” sa edad na pitong po at walo o 78.

Si Robert Charles Sproul ay na ordenahan taong 1965 bilang Kanunuan sa United Presbyterian Church in the USA at lumipat ng knasasapiang kapulungan noong 1975 sa Presbyterian Church in America.

"Incomparable Combination- As time went by, I came to realize that the impact of such preaching was owing to R.C.’s incomparable combination of allegiances.First, he had a serious and rigorous attention to the actual text of Scripture. He was not making his points in general, as his sermon floated in a fog above the text. He was reading the text. He was pushing my nose into the clauses. He was showing me what is really there. The shocking realities were real because they were really in the text.

Second, over time, when you heard R.C. do this kind of thing repeatedly, you realized such serious and rigorous attention to the text was owing to his total devotion to the inerrancy and radical relevance of the Scriptures. He didn’t believe that the message of biblical texts was innocuous and unexciting, and therefore in need of artificial verbal boosters to make the thunder crack. Oh no. If you take the text seriously, and you realize this is the very word of God, you may expect that its relevance will be repeatedly shocking.

Third, therefore, the jolting formulations of biblical truth that were sprinkled so liberally through R.C.’s preaching and writing were not artificially concocted to add effect, but strategically chosen to express reality. And he would say that the jolting expressions, if anything, fall short of, rather than exaggerate, the reality of the text.

Fourth, emerging from the exegesis, and rising in my heart, was an unashamed allegiance to the absolute sovereignty of God to show mercy or to judge according to his infinite wisdom. This was R.C.’s goal: a heart that is stunned and humbled and captivated by the transcendent greatness and purity of God." -  extracted from Unashamed Allegiance My Tribute to R.C. Sproul (1939–2017)  -by John Piper, Founder & Teacher, desiringGod.org https://www.desiringgod.org/articles/unashamed-allegiance

DRUG WARS 2018

The Curse is upon many of us... humanity is gradually being destroyed and poisoned by the Devil and by his agents of deceptions. We are all helpless .. there is only ONE WAY to be saved. and it is through The Son of GOD. The Saviour of the World! Jesus Christ of Nazareth. The Way, the Truth and the Life... ( John 14:6)

"Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved." -Acts 4:12

THE FIRST OPIUM WAR

 image source: http://www.sjapc.net/about-us/our-history/

1601 -- Original Jesuit mission is established at Beijing, China. The Jesuits, having achieved positions of "unquestioned authority" at the Chinese royal court, hold the key to the opium trade. They are later followed by the Portuguese and then the Dutch.

1659 -- The Dutch now control the ancient dope trade routes. In exchange for taxes paid to the Mogul court, Dutch traders are allowed to force Indian peasants to produce dope for them.

1715 -- The British East India Company opens an office in Canton,China.

1750 -- By now the Dutch are shipping more than 100 tons of opium per year to Indonesia. Besides business advantages, the Dutch have discovered that opium is "a useful means for breaking the moral resistance of Indonesians who opposed the introduction of their semi-servile but increasingly profitable plantation system. They deliberately spread the drug habits from the ports... to the countryside." (How were the drug habits "deliberately spread"? The book, *Dope, Inc.*, does not exactly say. Nowadays, certain "rebellious" rock and roll songs serve as advertising jingles which help lure in potential consumers. Censorship, however, is not the answer. But be aware when you hear lyrics such as "Ritalin is in. Ritalin is in," that "somebody" might be trying to sell you something.)

1757 -- Military victories make Bengal a British colony.

1783 -- Lord Shelburne, who concluded peace negotiations with America after our Revolutionary War, is the power behind William Pitt the Younger, British Prime Minister. Shelburne is allied with the Jesuits, the Knights of St. John of Jerusalem, and the East India Company.Both the British Empire and the East India Company are bankrupt. Lord Shelburne and associates take over the East India Company, and makes it "the central instrument of loot for the maintenance of the British Empire." Shelburne proposes to use "free trade" as a cover for both subverting the United States and expanding the opium trade into the Far East. Lord Shelburne is allied also with Francis Baring, an Anglo-Dutch banker.

1787 -- British Secretary of State Dundas has proposed that Britain force itself more into China so as to help augment the opium market there. The East India Company, acting in a manner reminiscent of our own American Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), establishes "cut outs" -- intermediaries -- to handle the export of opium from India to China.

1830 -- Number of chests filled with opium being brought into China has increased fourfold since late 1700s: 18,956 chests.

1836 -- Number of chests filled with opium being brought into China: greater than 30,000 chests.

1839 -- China launches its own version of a "War on Drugs". Lin Tse-hsu is appointed drug czar. He cracks down on the "Society of Heaven and Earth," also known as The Triad Society, which had been recruited by the East India Company into the opium business in the early 1800s. But Lin goes too far. He tries to arrest a British national connected to the dope trade. British warships intervene. Lin responds by holding British tea for ransom, until and unless merchants turn over their opium stockpiles. Britain's Lord Palmerston, backed by the powerful British Navy, demands (1) full legalization of opium trade into China; (2) compensation for opium stockpiles confiscated by Lin; and (3) British sovereignty over several offshore islands.

June 1840 -- The British fleet arrives in force and lays siege. Chinese forces are relatively weak, due partly to drug addiction within their Imperial Army. The Chinese Emperor asks for a peace treaty.




1842 -- The Treaty of Nanking, among other things, gives Hong Kong to the British. To this day Hong Kong is said to be the capital of British drug-running.

"The British stopped their opium trade in China in 1918, but by then, opium production had taken root in China, and the opium drug lords became completely indigenous and independent of foreign sources. The effects of the use of opium in China are difficult to calculate, but, in my opinion, it had a devastating result on the economy and on the government. Drug money was a sizable force for corruption in China, and that epidemic of government corruption left China in political and social turmoil for over a century. 

In the 1920s, the enterprising Chinese “green gang” manufactured heroine pills that were sold as a “cure for opium addiction.” In 1928, when heroine was banned in western nations, Chinese drug lords set up their own production facilities and expanded heroine distribution throughout China, Korea, and parts of southeast Asia. 

The Chinese drug cartels had immense wealth and power and political groups allied with them to gain power. The nation of Japan never would have been able to invade Manchuria and capture so much of China in the 20th century had China not been in a state of chaos. Opium was a prime force in the creation of that chaos. With them, the Japanese brought a new level of human misery to China. Approximately 20,000,000 Chinese people died as a consequence of the ruthless Japanese occupation.

The use of opium in China continued until the communist government took over all of mainland China in 1949. I have never been a fan of the Chinese Communist junta, but I must give them credit for finally outlawing opium and heroin in China. European traders could not have foreseen the long-term effects of opium sales in China. But in my view, China has not yet fully recovered from the impact of opium and heroin use there prior to 1949.  - extracted from http://socialinphilly.com/british-drug-pushers-in-china-the-2nd-opium-war/ - British Drug Pushers in China–The 2nd Opium War 

 1947 to 1951, FRANCE According to Alfred W. McCoy in The Politics of Heroin in Southeast Asia, CIA arms, money, and disinformation enabled Corsican criminal syndicates in Marseille to wrestle control of labor unions from the Communist Party. The Corsicans gained political influence and control over the docks — ideal conditions for cementing a long-term partnership with mafia drug distributors, which turned Marseille into the postwar heroin capital of the Western world. Marseille’s first heroin laboratones were opened in 1951, only months after the Corsicans took over the waterfront.

Signature page of the Treaty of Nanjing, signed August 29, 1842, at Nanjing, China, at the …

The National Archives/Heritage-Images

The Nationalist Chinese army, organized by the CIA to wage war against Communist China, became the opium barons of The Golden Triangle (parts of Burma, Thailand and Laos), the world’s largest source of opium and heroin. Air America, the ClA’s principal airline proprietary, flew the drugs all over Southeast Asia. (See Christopher Robbins, Air America, Avon Books, 1985, chapter 9)

 1950s to early 1970s, INDOCHINA  During U.S. military involvement in Laos and other parts of Indochina, Air America flew opium and heroin throughout the area. Many Gl’s in Vietnam became addicts. A laboratory built at CIA headquarters in northern Laos was used to refine heroin. After a decade of American military intervention, Southeast Asia had become the source of 70 percent of the world’s illicit opium and the major supplier of raw materials for America’s booming heroin market.
  
1973-80, AUSTRALIA The Nugan Hand Bank of Sydney was a CIA bank in all but name. Among its officers were a network of US generals, admirals and CIA men, including fommer CIA Director William Colby, who was also one of its lawyers. With branches in Saudi Arabia, Europe, Southeast Asia, South America and the U.S., Nugan Hand Bank financed drug trafficking, money laundering and international arms dealings. In 1980, amidst several mysterious deaths, the bank collapsed, $50 million in debt. (See Jonathan Kwitny, The Crimes of Patriots: A True Tale of Dope, Dirty Money and the CIA, W.W. Norton & Co., 1 987.)  

1970s and 1980s, PANAMA For more than a decade, Panamanian strongman Manuel Noriega was a highly paid CIA asset and collaborator, despite knowledge by U.S. drug authorities as early as 1971 that the general was heavily involved in drug trafficking and money laundering. Noriega facilitated ”guns-for-drugs” flights for the contras, providing protection and pilots, as well as safe havens for drug cartel otficials, and discreet banking facilities. U.S. officials, including then-ClA Director William Webster and several DEA officers, sent Noriega letters of praise for efforts to thwart drug trafficking (albeit only against competitors of his Medellin Cartel patrons). The U.S. government only turned against Noriega, invading Panama in December 1989 and kidnapping the general once they discovered he was providing intelligence and services to the Cubans and Sandinistas. Ironically drug trafficking through Panama increased after the US invasion. (John Dinges, Our Man in Panama, Random House, 1991; National Security Archive Documentation Packet The Contras, Cocaine, and Covert Operations.) 

 1980s, CENTRAL AMERICA The San Jose Mercury News series documents just one thread of the interwoven operations linking the CIA, the contras and the cocaine cartels. Obsessed with overthrowing the leftist Sandinista government in Nicaragua, Reagan administration officials tolerated drug trafficking as long as the traffickers gave support to the contras. In 1989, the Senate Subcommittee on Terrorism, Narcotics, and International Operations (the Kerry committee) concluded a three-year investigation by stating: “There was substantial evidence of drug smuggling through the war zones on the part of individual Contras, Contra suppliers, Contra pilots mercenaries who worked with the Contras, and Contra supporters throughout the region…. U.S. officials involved in Central America failed to address the drug issue for fear of jeopardizing the war efforts against Nicaragua…. In each case, one or another agency of the U.S. govemment had intormation regarding the involvement either while it was occurring, or immediately thereafter…. Senior U S policy makers were nit immune to the idea that drug money was a perfect solution to the Contras’ funding problems.” (Drugs, Law Enforcement and Foreign Policy, a Report of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, Subcommittee on Terrorism, Narcotics and Intemational Operations, 1989) 

 In Costa Rica, which served as the “Southern Front” for the contras (Honduras being the Northern Front), there were several different ClA-contra networks involved in drug trafficking. In addition to those servicing the Meneses-Blandon operation detailed by the Mercury News, and Noriega’s operation, there was CIA operative John Hull, whose farms along Costa Rica’s border with Nicaragua were the main staging area for the contras. Hull and other ClA-connected contra supporters and pilots teamed up with George Morales, a major Miami-based Colombian drug trafficker who later admitted to giving $3 million in cash and several planes to contra leaders. 

In 1989, after the Costa Rica government indicted Hull for drug trafficking, a DEA-hired plane clandestinely and illegally flew the CIA operative to Miami, via Haiti. The US repeatedly thwarted Costa Rican efforts to extradite Hull back to Costa Rica to stand trial. Another Costa Rican-based drug ring involved a group of Cuban Amencans whom the CIA had hired as military trainers for the contras. Many had long been involved with the CIA and drug trafficking They used contra planes and a Costa Rican-based shnmp company, which laundered money for the CIA, to move cocaine to the U.S. Costa Rica was not the only route. Guatemala, whose military intelligence service — closely associated with the CIA — harbored many drug traffickers, according to the DEA, was another way station along the cocaine highway. Additionally, the Medellin Cartel’s Miami accountant, Ramon Milian Rodriguez, testified that he funneled nearly $10 million to Nicaraguan contras through long-time CIA operative Felix Rodriguez, who was based at Ilopango Air Force Base in El Salvador. 

The contras provided both protection and infrastructure (planes, pilots, airstrips, warehouses, front companies and banks) to these ClA-linked drug networks. At least four transport companies under investigation for drug trafficking received US govemment contracts to carry non-lethal supplies to the contras. Southern Air Transport, “formerly” ClA-owned, and later under Pentagon contract, was involved in the drug running as well. Cocaine-laden planes flew to Florida, Texas, Louisiana and other locations, including several militarv bases Designated as ‘Contra Craft,” these shipments were not to be inspected. When some authority wasn’t clued in and made an arrest, powerful strings were pulled on behalf of dropping the case, acquittal, reduced sentence, or deportation.

 Drug Boss Escobar Worked for the CIA

The notorious cocaine kingpin Pablo Escobar worked closely with the CIA, according to his son. In this episode of The Geopolitical Report, we look at the long history of CIA involvement in the international narcotics trade, beginning with its collaboration with the French Mafia to using drug money to illegally fund the Contras and overthrow the Sandinista government in Nicaragua. We also look at how drug profits are used to float Wall Street and the role big banks play in laundering huge amounts of illicit drug profits. 



1980s to early 1990s, AFGHANISTAN ClA-supported Moujahedeen rebels engaged heavily in drug trafficking while fighting against the Soviet-supported govemment and its plans to reform the very backward Afghan society. The Agency’s principal client was Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, one of the leading druglords and leading heroin refiner. CIA supplied trucks and mules, which had carried arms into Afghanistan, were used to transport opium to laboratories along the Afghan Pakistan border. The output provided up to one half of the heroin used annually in the United States and three-quarters of that used in Western Europe. US officials admitted in 1990 that they had failed to investigate or take action against the drug operabon because of a desire not to offend their Pakistani and Afghan allies. In 1993, an official of the DEA called Afghanistan the new Colombia of the drug world.  

MlD-1980s to early 199Os, HAITI While working to keep key Haitian military and political leaders in power, the CIA turned a blind eye to their clients’ drug trafficking. In 1986, the Agency added some more names to its payroll by creating a new Haitian organization, the National Intelligence Service (SIN). SIN was purportedly created to fight the cocaine trade, though SIN officers themselves engaged in the trafficking, a trade aided and abetted by some of the Haitian military and political leaders. William Blum is author of Killing Hope: U.S Military and CIA Interventions Since World War ll available from Common Courage Press, P.O. Box 702, Monroe, Maine, 04951 The original source of this article is revolutionradio.org and Global Research Copyright © William Blum, revolutionradio.org and Global Research, 2015  

"Below is a list of other Vatican officials who directed the CIA drug operations for the Jesuits.  

William Joseph Casey (March 13, 1913 – May 6, 1987) was the Director of Central Intelligence from 1981 to 1987. In this capacity he oversaw the entire United States Intelligence Community and personally directed the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). He was a Knight of Malta submitted to the Vatican and Jesuit Order.

  John Alexander McCone (January 4, 1902 – February 14, 1991) was an American businessman and politician who served as Director of Central Intelligence during the height of the Cold War. He was a Knight of Malta submitted to the Vatican and Jesuit Order.

Allen Welsh Dulles (/ˈdʌləs/; April 7, 1893 – January 29, 1969) was an American diplomat and lawyer who became the first civilian Director of Central Intelligence and its longest-serving director to date. Dulles was also the Uncle to a Jesuit Priest named, Avery Dulles. The Jesuits who control the military’s and intelligence agencies of the world through their Knights of Malta and other Orders, are responsible for all the nasty street drugs being distributed into our communities. This is also part of the Jesuit secret oath to put to death all heretics and curse them. The Jesuits are masters and students of poison (The Jesuit secret oath encourages Jesuits to poison those who won’t submit to the Pope and Jesuit General). The Vatican Council of Trent also pronounces a number of curses upon Protestants who believe in Salvation through faith in Jesus alone. By distributing nasty drugs into the community, the Jesuits and Vatican control a worldwide economy that generates more revenue than oil, and they also get to poison and destroy heretics by selling poisonous drugs to the youth.

 Former Mafia boss, Tony Gambino, also confirmed in a radio interview with Greg Szymanski and Eric Jon Phelps, that the Mafia was working for the Vatican and Jesuit Order. The Vatican and Jesuits who control the CIA through the Knights of Malta (who are submitted to the Jesuit controlled Pope), are placing clean cut looking Roman Catholics who work for the Jesuits in positions of power in the CIA. These clean cut looking alter boys in the CIA, are secretly working with the Mafia to make money for the Vatican and Jesuits (David Yallop in his book, “In God’s name” clearly proves Mafia and organized crime drug money ends up in the Vatican Bank). 

The Jesuit drug trade profits allow the Jesuits to maintain control over the world.

David Yallop also proved that much of the Mafia drug money that ended up in the Vatican bank, was used to purchase weapons for political parties in South America. It seems the Vatican uses their Knights of Malta in the CIA to control governments by funding the Contra army, and they also use their actual Vatican bank, to send funds to sympathetic governments who will obey the Jesuit Order. 

The Vatican and the CIA are one entity, they always have been. The CIA is a Jesuit and Vatican engine used to increase Jesuit control over the world, this control will also lead to another Vatican inquisition of Protestants, unless Protestants wake up to the the dangers posed by the Vatican and Jesuits." - extracted from https://reptiliandimension.wordpress.com/2015/02/02/the-jesuit-and-vatican-international-drug-trafficking-empire/ - The Jesuit and Vatican international drug trafficking Empire